Acura RL vs Mercedes-Benz E320
Side-by-side comparison from manufacturer specifications, NHTSA safety data, and live dealer listings.
Vehicles
Vehicles
2009 Mercedes-Benz E320
Overview
| Spec | Acura RLBase | Mercedes-Benz E320E320 BlueTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Selected trim | Base | E320 BlueTEC |
| Body style | Sedan | Sedan |
| Drivetrain | all wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
| Fuel type | premium unleaded (required) | diesel fuel |
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
| Engine type | gas | diesel |
| Model year | 2012 | 2009 |
Pricing & market
| Spec | Acura RLBase | Mercedes-Benz E320E320 BlueTEC |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $48,200 (best) | $54,200 |
| For sale now | 0 | 0 |
Fuel economy & range
| Spec | Acura RLBase | Mercedes-Benz E320E320 BlueTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 20 MPG | 26 MPG (best) |
| City MPG | 17 MPG | 23 MPG (best) |
| Highway MPG | 24 MPG | 32 MPG (best) |
| Fuel tank | 19.3 gal | 21.1 gal (best) |
Performance
| Spec | Acura RLBase | Mercedes-Benz E320E320 BlueTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 300 hp (best) | 210 hp |
| Torque | 271 lb-ft | 400 lb-ft (best) |
| Engine size | 3.7 L (best) | 3 L |
| Cylinders | V6 | V6 |
Size & capability
| Spec | Acura RLBase | Mercedes-Benz E320E320 BlueTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Seating | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Cargo volume | 13.1 cu ft | 15.9 cu ft (best) |
| Curb weight | 4,083 lbs | 3,860 lbs (best) |
| Ground clearance | 5.7 in (best) | 4.1 in |
| Wheelbase | 110.2 in | 112.4 in (best) |
| Length | 195.7 in (best) | 191 in |
| Width | 72.7 in (best) | 71.7 in |
| Height | 57.2 in | 58.4 in (best) |
Safety & recalls
| Spec | Acura RLBase | Mercedes-Benz E320E320 BlueTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Rollover | 5 / 5 ★ (best) | — |
| Open recalls (YMM scope) | 6 | 3 (best) |
Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that spec when a clear winner exists. Specs reflect the selected trim for each vehicle. Drag a vehicle header to reorder columns. MSRP and specifications are manufacturer data; listing prices and inventory come from live dealer listings. Safety ratings are from NHTSA.
Trim overview
All available trims with MSRP. The trim selected above is highlighted; comparison specs use that selection.
| Trim | Acura RL | Mercedes-Benz E320 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Base $48,200 MSRP(Currently comparing) | E320 BlueTEC $54,200 MSRP(Currently comparing) |
| 2 | Technology Package $52,350 MSRP | — |
| 3 | Technology Package - in HI $52,350 MSRP | — |
| 4 | Advance Package $56,150 MSRP | — |
Acura RL vs Mercedes-Benz E320 FAQ
- Which is better: 2012 Acura RL or 2009 Mercedes-Benz E320?
- It depends on priorities. OpenDealer compares 2012 Acura RL vs 2009 Mercedes-Benz E320 on MSRP, fuel economy, horsepower, seating, towing, NHTSA safety ratings, and live market prices so you can weigh the tradeoffs.
- Which costs less: 2012 Acura RL or 2009 Mercedes-Benz E320?
- Based on starting MSRP, the 2012 Acura RL starts lower at $48,200.
- Which has better startingMsrp: 2012 Acura RL or 2009 Mercedes-Benz E320?
- The 2012 Acura RL leads on startingMsrp in this comparison (48,200).
- Which has better combinedMpg: 2012 Acura RL or 2009 Mercedes-Benz E320?
- The 2009 Mercedes-Benz E320 leads on combinedMpg in this comparison (26).
- Which has better horsepower: 2012 Acura RL or 2009 Mercedes-Benz E320?
- The 2012 Acura RL leads on horsepower in this comparison (300).