BMW 840Ci vs Toyota Paseo
Side-by-side comparison from manufacturer specifications, NHTSA safety data, and live dealer listings.
Vehicles
Vehicles
1997 Toyota Paseo
Overview
| Spec | BMW 840Ci840Ci | Toyota PaseoBase |
|---|---|---|
| Selected trim | 840Ci | Base |
| Body style | Coupe | Convertible |
| Drivetrain | rear wheel drive | front wheel drive |
| Fuel type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 5-speed manual |
| Engine type | gas | gas |
| Model year | 1997 | 1997 |
Pricing & market
| Spec | BMW 840Ci840Ci | Toyota PaseoBase |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| For sale now | 0 | 0 |
Fuel economy & range
| Spec | BMW 840Ci840Ci | Toyota PaseoBase |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 15 MPG | 28 MPG (best) |
| City MPG | 14 MPG | 25 MPG (best) |
| Highway MPG | 19 MPG | 32 MPG (best) |
| Fuel tank | 23.8 gal (best) | 11.9 gal |
Performance
| Spec | BMW 840Ci840Ci | Toyota PaseoBase |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 282 hp (best) | 93 hp |
| Torque | 310 lb-ft (best) | 100 lb-ft |
| Engine size | 4.4 L (best) | 1.5 L |
| Cylinders | V8 | I4 |
Size & capability
| Spec | BMW 840Ci840Ci | Toyota PaseoBase |
|---|---|---|
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Cargo volume | 9.5 cu ft (best) | 6.6 cu ft |
| Curb weight | 4,167 lbs | 2,025 lbs (best) |
| Wheelbase | 105.7 in (best) | 93.7 in |
| Length | 188.2 in (best) | 163.3 in |
| Width | 73 in (best) | 65.4 in |
| Height | 52.8 in (best) | 51 in |
Safety & recalls
| Spec | BMW 840Ci840Ci | Toyota PaseoBase |
|---|---|---|
| Frontal crash (driver) | — | 4 / 5 ★ (best) |
| Frontal crash (passenger) | — | 4 / 5 ★ (best) |
| Open recalls (YMM scope) | 1 | None reported (best) |
Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that spec when a clear winner exists. Specs reflect the selected trim for each vehicle. Drag a vehicle header to reorder columns. MSRP and specifications are manufacturer data; listing prices and inventory come from live dealer listings. Safety ratings are from NHTSA.
Trim overview
All available trims with MSRP. The trim selected above is highlighted; comparison specs use that selection.
| Trim | BMW 840Ci | Toyota Paseo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 840Ci $0 MSRP(Currently comparing) | Base $0 MSRP(Currently comparing) |
| 2 | — | Base $0 MSRP |
BMW 840Ci vs Toyota Paseo FAQ
- Which is better: 1997 BMW 840Ci or 1997 Toyota Paseo?
- It depends on priorities. OpenDealer compares 1997 BMW 840Ci vs 1997 Toyota Paseo on MSRP, fuel economy, horsepower, seating, towing, NHTSA safety ratings, and live market prices so you can weigh the tradeoffs.
- Which costs less: 1997 BMW 840Ci or 1997 Toyota Paseo?
- Based on starting MSRP, the 1997 BMW 840Ci starts lower at $0.
- Which has better combinedMpg: 1997 BMW 840Ci or 1997 Toyota Paseo?
- The 1997 Toyota Paseo leads on combinedMpg in this comparison (29).
- Which has better horsepower: 1997 BMW 840Ci or 1997 Toyota Paseo?
- The 1997 BMW 840Ci leads on horsepower in this comparison (282).