Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WD vs Dodge Ram 3500
Side-by-side comparison from manufacturer specifications, NHTSA safety data, and live dealer listings.
Vehicles
Vehicles
2010 Dodge Ram 3500
Overview
| Spec | Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WDBase | Dodge Ram 3500ST |
|---|---|---|
| Selected trim | Base | ST |
| Body style | Truck (Crew Cab) | Truck (Regular Cab) |
| Drivetrain | rear wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
| Fuel type | regular unleaded | diesel fuel |
| Transmission | 5-speed manual | 6-speed manual |
| Engine type | gas | diesel |
| Model year | 2000 | 2010 |
Pricing & market
| Spec | Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WDBase | Dodge Ram 3500ST |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 (best) | $34,680 |
| For sale now | 0 | 0 |
Fuel economy & range
| Spec | Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WDBase | Dodge Ram 3500ST |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel tank | 34 gal | 35 gal (best) |
Performance
| Spec | Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WDBase | Dodge Ram 3500ST |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 255 hp | 350 hp (best) |
| Torque | 330 lb-ft | 650 lb-ft (best) |
| Engine size | 5.7 L | 6.7 L (best) |
| Cylinders | V8 | I6 |
Size & capability
| Spec | Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WDBase | Dodge Ram 3500ST |
|---|---|---|
| Seating | — | 3 seats (best) |
| Doors | 4 (best) | 2 |
| Towing capacity | — | 17,600 lbs (best) |
| Payload | 3,531 lbs | 4,650 lbs (best) |
| Curb weight | 5,869 lbs (best) | 6,847 lbs |
| Ground clearance | 6.4 in | 7.6 in (best) |
| Wheelbase | 168.5 in (best) | 140.5 in |
| Length | 250.9 in (best) | 231 in |
| Width | 77 in (best) | — |
| Height | 74.5 in (best) | 73.6 in |
Safety & recalls
| Spec | Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WDBase | Dodge Ram 3500ST |
|---|---|---|
| Open recalls (YMM scope) | None reported (best) | 9 |
Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that spec when a clear winner exists. Specs reflect the selected trim for each vehicle. Drag a vehicle header to reorder columns. MSRP and specifications are manufacturer data; listing prices and inventory come from live dealer listings. Safety ratings are from NHTSA.
Trim overview
All available trims with MSRP. The trim selected above is highlighted; comparison specs use that selection.
| Trim | Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WD | Dodge Ram 3500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Base $0 MSRP(Currently comparing) | ST $34,680 MSRP(Currently comparing) |
| 2 | Base $0 MSRP | ST $38,250 MSRP |
| 3 | Base $0 MSRP | ST $38,450 MSRP |
| 4 | Base $0 MSRP | ST $37,595 MSRP |
| 5 | Base $0 MSRP | ST $41,350 MSRP |
| 6 | Base $0 MSRP | ST $41,550 MSRP |
| 7 | LS $0 MSRP | SLT $38,320 MSRP |
| 8 | LS $0 MSRP | SLT $43,485 MSRP |
| 9 | LS $0 MSRP | SLT $43,685 MSRP |
| 10 | LS $0 MSRP | SLT $44,185 MSRP |
| 11 | — | SLT $41,490 MSRP |
| 12 | — | SLT $46,430 MSRP |
| 13 | — | SLT $46,630 MSRP |
| 14 | — | SLT $47,130 MSRP |
| 15 | — | Laramie $47,065 MSRP |
| 16 | — | Laramie $47,265 MSRP |
| 17 | — | Laramie $47,765 MSRP |
| 18 | — | Laramie $49,945 MSRP |
| 19 | — | Laramie $50,145 MSRP |
| 20 | — | Laramie $50,645 MSRP |
Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WD vs Dodge Ram 3500 FAQ
- Which is better: 2000 Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WD or 2010 Dodge Ram 3500?
- It depends on priorities. OpenDealer compares 2000 Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WD vs 2010 Dodge Ram 3500 on MSRP, fuel economy, horsepower, seating, towing, NHTSA safety ratings, and live market prices so you can weigh the tradeoffs.
- Which costs less: 2000 Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WD or 2010 Dodge Ram 3500?
- Based on starting MSRP, the 2000 Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WD starts lower at $0.
- Which has better startingMsrp: 2000 Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WD or 2010 Dodge Ram 3500?
- The 2000 Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WD leads on startingMsrp in this comparison (0).
- Which has better horsepower: 2000 Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WD or 2010 Dodge Ram 3500?
- The 2010 Dodge Ram 3500 leads on horsepower in this comparison (350).
- Which has better seats: 2000 Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WD or 2010 Dodge Ram 3500?
- The 2010 Dodge Ram 3500 leads on seats in this comparison (6).
- Which has better maxTowingLbs: 2000 Chevrolet K3500 Pickup 4WD or 2010 Dodge Ram 3500?
- The 2010 Dodge Ram 3500 leads on maxTowingLbs in this comparison (17,600).