Chevrolet Suburban 2500 vs Oldsmobile Bravada
Side-by-side comparison from manufacturer specifications, NHTSA safety data, and live dealer listings.
Vehicles
Vehicles
2004 Oldsmobile Bravada
Overview
| Spec | Chevrolet Suburban 2500LS 2500 | Oldsmobile BravadaBase |
|---|---|---|
| Selected trim | LS 2500 | Base |
| Body style | SUV | SUV |
| Drivetrain | rear wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
| Fuel type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 4-speed automatic |
| Engine type | gas | gas |
| Model year | 2013 | 2004 |
Pricing & market
| Spec | Chevrolet Suburban 2500LS 2500 | Oldsmobile BravadaBase |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $45,480 | $33,920 (best) |
| For sale now | 0 | 0 |
Fuel economy & range
| Spec | Chevrolet Suburban 2500LS 2500 | Oldsmobile BravadaBase |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 12 MPG | 16 MPG (best) |
| City MPG | 10 MPG | 14 MPG (best) |
| Highway MPG | 16 MPG | 19 MPG (best) |
| Fuel tank | 39 gal (best) | 22 gal |
Performance
| Spec | Chevrolet Suburban 2500LS 2500 | Oldsmobile BravadaBase |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 352 hp (best) | 275 hp |
| Torque | 382 lb-ft (best) | 275 lb-ft |
| Engine size | 6 L (best) | 4.2 L |
| Cylinders | V8 | I6 |
Size & capability
| Spec | Chevrolet Suburban 2500LS 2500 | Oldsmobile BravadaBase |
|---|---|---|
| Seating | 8 seats (best) | 5 seats |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Cargo volume | 137.4 cu ft (best) | 80.1 cu ft |
| Towing capacity | 9,600 lbs (best) | 5,700 lbs |
| Payload | 2,450 lbs (best) | 1,133 lbs |
| Curb weight | 6,150 lbs | 4,417 lbs (best) |
| Ground clearance | 9.1 in (best) | 8 in |
| Wheelbase | 130 in (best) | 113 in |
| Length | 222.4 in (best) | 191.8 in |
| Width | 79.1 in (best) | 75.4 in |
| Height | 76.8 in (best) | 74.5 in |
Safety & recalls
| Spec | Chevrolet Suburban 2500LS 2500 | Oldsmobile BravadaBase |
|---|---|---|
| Frontal crash (driver) | — | 3 / 5 ★ (best) |
| Frontal crash (passenger) | — | 3 / 5 ★ (best) |
| Rollover | — | 4 / 5 ★ (best) |
| Open recalls (YMM scope) | None reported (best) | 2 |
Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that spec when a clear winner exists. Specs reflect the selected trim for each vehicle. Drag a vehicle header to reorder columns. MSRP and specifications are manufacturer data; listing prices and inventory come from live dealer listings. Safety ratings are from NHTSA.
Trim overview
All available trims with MSRP. The trim selected above is highlighted; comparison specs use that selection.
| Trim | Chevrolet Suburban 2500 | Oldsmobile Bravada |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | LS 2500 $45,480 MSRP(Currently comparing) | Base $33,920 MSRP(Currently comparing) |
| 2 | LS 2500 $48,320 MSRP | Base $35,870 MSRP |
| 3 | LT 2500 $49,220 MSRP | — |
| 4 | LT 2500 $52,065 MSRP | — |
Chevrolet Suburban 2500 vs Oldsmobile Bravada FAQ
- Which is better: 2013 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 or 2004 Oldsmobile Bravada?
- It depends on priorities. OpenDealer compares 2013 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 vs 2004 Oldsmobile Bravada on MSRP, fuel economy, horsepower, seating, towing, NHTSA safety ratings, and live market prices so you can weigh the tradeoffs.
- Which costs less: 2013 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 or 2004 Oldsmobile Bravada?
- Based on starting MSRP, the 2004 Oldsmobile Bravada starts lower at $33,920.
- Which has better startingMsrp: 2013 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 or 2004 Oldsmobile Bravada?
- The 2004 Oldsmobile Bravada leads on startingMsrp in this comparison (33,920).
- Which has better combinedMpg: 2013 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 or 2004 Oldsmobile Bravada?
- The 2004 Oldsmobile Bravada leads on combinedMpg in this comparison (16).
- Which has better horsepower: 2013 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 or 2004 Oldsmobile Bravada?
- The 2013 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 leads on horsepower in this comparison (352).
- Which has better seats: 2013 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 or 2004 Oldsmobile Bravada?
- The 2013 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 leads on seats in this comparison (8).
- Which has better maxTowingLbs: 2013 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 or 2004 Oldsmobile Bravada?
- The 2013 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 leads on maxTowingLbs in this comparison (9,600).