Chrysler Sebring vs Toyota MR2 Spyder
Side-by-side comparison from manufacturer specifications, NHTSA safety data, and live dealer listings.
Vehicles
Vehicles
2005 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Overview
| Spec | Chrysler SebringTouring | Toyota MR2 SpyderBase |
|---|---|---|
| Selected trim | Touring | Base |
| Body style | Sedan | Convertible |
| Drivetrain | front wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
| Fuel type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| Transmission | 4-speed automatic | 5-speed manual |
| Engine type | gas | gas |
| Model year | 2010 | 2005 |
Pricing & market
| Spec | Chrysler SebringTouring | Toyota MR2 SpyderBase |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $20,120 (best) | $25,145 |
| Lowest listing price | $6,674 (best) | — |
| Median listing price | $6,674 (best) | — |
| Highest listing price | $6,674 (best) | — |
| For sale now | 1 (best) | 0 |
Fuel economy & range
| Spec | Chrysler SebringTouring | Toyota MR2 SpyderBase |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 24 MPG | 25 MPG (best) |
| City MPG | 21 MPG | 23 MPG (best) |
| Highway MPG | 30 MPG (best) | 29 MPG |
| Fuel tank | 16.9 gal (best) | 12.7 gal |
Performance
| Spec | Chrysler SebringTouring | Toyota MR2 SpyderBase |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 173 hp (best) | 138 hp |
| Torque | 166 lb-ft (best) | 125 lb-ft |
| Engine size | 2.4 L (best) | 1.8 L |
| Cylinders | I4 | I4 |
Size & capability
| Spec | Chrysler SebringTouring | Toyota MR2 SpyderBase |
|---|---|---|
| Seating | 5 seats (best) | 2 seats |
| Doors | 4 (best) | 2 |
| Cargo volume | 13.6 cu ft (best) | 1.9 cu ft |
| Towing capacity | 1,000 lbs (best) | — |
| Curb weight | 3,310 lbs | 2,195 lbs (best) |
| Ground clearance | — | 4.9 in (best) |
| Wheelbase | 108.9 in (best) | 96.5 in |
| Length | 190.6 in (best) | 153 in |
| Width | 71.2 in (best) | 66.7 in |
| Height | 59 in (best) | 48.8 in |
Safety & recalls
| Spec | Chrysler SebringTouring | Toyota MR2 SpyderBase |
|---|---|---|
| Frontal crash (driver) | 5 / 5 ★ (best) | — |
| Frontal crash (passenger) | 5 / 5 ★ (best) | — |
| Open recalls (YMM scope) | 3 | None reported (best) |
Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that spec when a clear winner exists. Specs reflect the selected trim for each vehicle. Drag a vehicle header to reorder columns. MSRP and specifications are manufacturer data; listing prices and inventory come from live dealer listings. Safety ratings are from NHTSA.
Trim overview
All available trims with MSRP. The trim selected above is highlighted; comparison specs use that selection.
| Trim | Chrysler Sebring | Toyota MR2 Spyder |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Touring $20,120 MSRP(Currently comparing) | Base $25,145 MSRP(Currently comparing) |
| 2 | Touring $29,210 MSRP | Base $26,145 MSRP |
| 3 | Limited $22,115 MSRP | — |
| 4 | Limited $32,710 MSRP | — |
| 5 | LX $27,850 MSRP | — |
Live inventory
Chrysler Sebring vs Toyota MR2 Spyder FAQ
- Which is better: 2010 Chrysler Sebring or 2005 Toyota MR2 Spyder?
- It depends on priorities. OpenDealer compares 2010 Chrysler Sebring vs 2005 Toyota MR2 Spyder on MSRP, fuel economy, horsepower, seating, towing, NHTSA safety ratings, and live market prices so you can weigh the tradeoffs.
- Which costs less: 2010 Chrysler Sebring or 2005 Toyota MR2 Spyder?
- Based on starting MSRP, the 2010 Chrysler Sebring starts lower at $20,120. Live Chrysler Sebring listings start at $6,674.
- Which has better startingMsrp: 2010 Chrysler Sebring or 2005 Toyota MR2 Spyder?
- The 2010 Chrysler Sebring leads on startingMsrp in this comparison (20,120).
- Which has better combinedMpg: 2010 Chrysler Sebring or 2005 Toyota MR2 Spyder?
- The 2005 Toyota MR2 Spyder leads on combinedMpg in this comparison (26).
- Which has better horsepower: 2010 Chrysler Sebring or 2005 Toyota MR2 Spyder?
- The 2010 Chrysler Sebring leads on horsepower in this comparison (235).
- Which has better seats: 2010 Chrysler Sebring or 2005 Toyota MR2 Spyder?
- The 2010 Chrysler Sebring leads on seats in this comparison (5).
- Which has better maxTowingLbs: 2010 Chrysler Sebring or 2005 Toyota MR2 Spyder?
- The 2010 Chrysler Sebring leads on maxTowingLbs in this comparison (1,000).