Chrysler Voyager vs Mercury Villager
Side-by-side comparison from manufacturer specifications, NHTSA safety data, and live dealer listings.
Vehicles
Vehicles
2002 Mercury Villager
Overview
| Spec | Chrysler VoyagerLX | Mercury VillagerValue |
|---|---|---|
| Selected trim | LX | Value |
| Body style | Minivan | Minivan |
| Drivetrain | front wheel drive | front wheel drive |
| Fuel type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| Transmission | 9-speed automatic | 4-speed automatic |
| Engine type | gas | gas |
| Model year | 2026 | 2002 |
Pricing & market
| Spec | Chrysler VoyagerLX | Mercury VillagerValue |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $41,395 | $19,340 (best) |
| For sale now | 0 | 0 |
Fuel economy & range
| Spec | Chrysler VoyagerLX | Mercury VillagerValue |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 22 MPG (best) | 17 MPG |
| City MPG | 19 MPG (best) | 15 MPG |
| Highway MPG | 28 MPG (best) | 21 MPG |
| Fuel tank | 19 gal | 20 gal (best) |
Performance
| Spec | Chrysler VoyagerLX | Mercury VillagerValue |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 287 hp (best) | 170 hp |
| Torque | 262 lb-ft (best) | 200 lb-ft |
| Engine size | 3.6 L (best) | 3.3 L |
| Cylinders | V6 | V6 |
Size & capability
| Spec | Chrysler VoyagerLX | Mercury VillagerValue |
|---|---|---|
| Seating | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Doors | 4 | 5 (best) |
| Cargo volume | 140.5 cu ft (best) | — |
| Towing capacity | 3,600 lbs (best) | 3,500 lbs |
| Curb weight | 4,330 lbs | 3,997 lbs (best) |
| Ground clearance | 5.1 in (best) | — |
| Wheelbase | 121.6 in (best) | 112.2 in |
| Length | 203.8 in (best) | 194.9 in |
| Width | 79.6 in (best) | 74.9 in |
| Height | 69.9 in | 70.1 in (best) |
Safety & recalls
| Spec | Chrysler VoyagerLX | Mercury VillagerValue |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA overall | 5 / 5 ★ (best) | — |
| Frontal crash (driver) | 5 / 5 ★ | 5 / 5 ★ |
| Frontal crash (passenger) | 5 / 5 ★ | 5 / 5 ★ |
| Side crash (driver) | 5 / 5 ★ (best) | — |
| Side crash (passenger) | 5 / 5 ★ (best) | — |
| Side pole | 5 / 5 ★ (best) | — |
| Rollover | 4 / 5 ★ (best) | — |
| Open recalls (YMM scope) | 4 | None reported (best) |
Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that spec when a clear winner exists. Specs reflect the selected trim for each vehicle. Drag a vehicle header to reorder columns. MSRP and specifications are manufacturer data; listing prices and inventory come from live dealer listings. Safety ratings are from NHTSA.
Trim overview
All available trims with MSRP. The trim selected above is highlighted; comparison specs use that selection.
| Trim | Chrysler Voyager | Mercury Villager |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | LX $41,395 MSRP(Currently comparing) | Value $19,340 MSRP(Currently comparing) |
| 2 | — | Sport $24,340 MSRP |
| 3 | — | Sport Plus $25,340 MSRP |
| 4 | — | Estate $26,340 MSRP |
| 5 | — | Estate Premium $27,340 MSRP |
Chrysler Voyager vs Mercury Villager FAQ
- Which is better: 2026 Chrysler Voyager or 2002 Mercury Villager?
- It depends on priorities. OpenDealer compares 2026 Chrysler Voyager vs 2002 Mercury Villager on MSRP, fuel economy, horsepower, seating, towing, NHTSA safety ratings, and live market prices so you can weigh the tradeoffs.
- Which costs less: 2026 Chrysler Voyager or 2002 Mercury Villager?
- Based on starting MSRP, the 2002 Mercury Villager starts lower at $19,340.
- Which has better startingMsrp: 2026 Chrysler Voyager or 2002 Mercury Villager?
- The 2002 Mercury Villager leads on startingMsrp in this comparison (19,340).
- Which has better combinedMpg: 2026 Chrysler Voyager or 2002 Mercury Villager?
- The 2026 Chrysler Voyager leads on combinedMpg in this comparison (22).
- Which has better horsepower: 2026 Chrysler Voyager or 2002 Mercury Villager?
- The 2026 Chrysler Voyager leads on horsepower in this comparison (287).
- Which has better maxTowingLbs: 2026 Chrysler Voyager or 2002 Mercury Villager?
- The 2026 Chrysler Voyager leads on maxTowingLbs in this comparison (3,600).
- How do the NHTSA safety ratings compare for 2026 Chrysler Voyager vs 2002 Mercury Villager?
- NHTSA overall crash-test ratings in this comparison: Chrysler Voyager (5/5 NHTSA overall).