Dodge Dakota vs Suzuki Equator
Side-by-side comparison from manufacturer specifications, NHTSA safety data, and live dealer listings.
Vehicles
Vehicles
2012 Suzuki Equator
Overview
| Spec | Dodge DakotaST | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Selected trim | ST | Base |
| Body style | Truck (Extended Cab) | Truck (Extended Cab) |
| Drivetrain | rear wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
| Fuel type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| Transmission | 4-speed automatic | 5-speed manual |
| Engine type | gas | gas |
| Model year | 2010 | 2012 |
Pricing & market
| Spec | Dodge DakotaST | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $22,755 | $17,899 (best) |
| For sale now | 0 | 0 |
Fuel economy & range
| Spec | Dodge DakotaST | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 17 MPG | 21 MPG (best) |
| City MPG | 15 MPG | 19 MPG (best) |
| Highway MPG | 20 MPG | 23 MPG (best) |
| Fuel tank | 22 gal (best) | 21.1 gal |
Performance
| Spec | Dodge DakotaST | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 210 hp (best) | 152 hp |
| Torque | 235 lb-ft (best) | 171 lb-ft |
| Engine size | 3.7 L (best) | 2.5 L |
| Cylinders | V6 | I4 |
Size & capability
| Spec | Dodge DakotaST | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Seating | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Towing capacity | 7,250 lbs (best) | 3,500 lbs |
| Payload | 1,810 lbs (best) | 986 lbs |
| Curb weight | 4,200 lbs | 3,686 lbs (best) |
| Ground clearance | 7.9 in (best) | 7.6 in |
| Wheelbase | 131.3 in (best) | 125.9 in |
| Length | 218.5 in (best) | 206.6 in |
| Width | 71.7 in | 72.8 in (best) |
| Height | 68.6 in | 68.7 in (best) |
Safety & recalls
| Spec | Dodge DakotaST | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Frontal crash (driver) | 5 / 5 ★ (best) | — |
| Frontal crash (passenger) | 5 / 5 ★ (best) | — |
| Rollover | 4 / 5 ★ | 4 / 5 ★ |
| Open recalls (YMM scope) | 7 | 2 (best) |
Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that spec when a clear winner exists. Specs reflect the selected trim for each vehicle. Drag a vehicle header to reorder columns. MSRP and specifications are manufacturer data; listing prices and inventory come from live dealer listings. Safety ratings are from NHTSA.
Trim overview
All available trims with MSRP. The trim selected above is highlighted; comparison specs use that selection.
| Trim | Dodge Dakota | Suzuki Equator |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ST $22,755 MSRP(Currently comparing) | Base $17,899 MSRP(Currently comparing) |
| 2 | ST $25,305 MSRP | Comfort Package $19,299 MSRP |
| 3 | ST $27,005 MSRP | Premium $22,799 MSRP |
| 4 | ST $28,255 MSRP | Sport $25,699 MSRP |
| 5 | BigHorn $23,630 MSRP | Sport $26,299 MSRP |
| 6 | BigHorn $26,325 MSRP | Sport $28,699 MSRP |
| 7 | BigHorn $27,880 MSRP | RMZ-4 $29,550 MSRP |
| 8 | BigHorn $29,275 MSRP | — |
| 9 | LoneStar $23,630 MSRP | — |
| 10 | LoneStar $26,325 MSRP | — |
| 11 | LoneStar $27,880 MSRP | — |
| 12 | LoneStar $29,275 MSRP | — |
| 13 | Laramie $30,180 MSRP | — |
| 14 | Laramie $33,180 MSRP | — |
| 15 | TRX $31,365 MSRP | — |
Dodge Dakota vs Suzuki Equator FAQ
- Which is better: 2010 Dodge Dakota or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- It depends on priorities. OpenDealer compares 2010 Dodge Dakota vs 2012 Suzuki Equator on MSRP, fuel economy, horsepower, seating, towing, NHTSA safety ratings, and live market prices so you can weigh the tradeoffs.
- Which costs less: 2010 Dodge Dakota or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- Based on starting MSRP, the 2012 Suzuki Equator starts lower at $17,899.
- Which has better startingMsrp: 2010 Dodge Dakota or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- The 2012 Suzuki Equator leads on startingMsrp in this comparison (17,899).
- Which has better combinedMpg: 2010 Dodge Dakota or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- The 2012 Suzuki Equator leads on combinedMpg in this comparison (21).
- Which has better horsepower: 2010 Dodge Dakota or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- The 2010 Dodge Dakota leads on horsepower in this comparison (302).
- Which has better maxTowingLbs: 2010 Dodge Dakota or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- The 2010 Dodge Dakota leads on maxTowingLbs in this comparison (7,250).