Ford Aerostar vs Mercury Villager
Side-by-side comparison from manufacturer specifications, NHTSA safety data, and live dealer listings.
Vehicles
Vehicles
2002 Mercury Villager
Overview
| Spec | Ford AerostarBase | Mercury VillagerValue |
|---|---|---|
| Selected trim | Base | Value |
| Body style | Minivan | Minivan |
| Drivetrain | rear wheel drive | front wheel drive |
| Fuel type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| Transmission | 4-speed automatic | 4-speed automatic |
| Engine type | gas | gas |
| Model year | 1997 | 2002 |
Pricing & market
| Spec | Ford AerostarBase | Mercury VillagerValue |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 (best) | $19,340 |
| For sale now | 0 | 0 |
Fuel economy & range
| Spec | Ford AerostarBase | Mercury VillagerValue |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 17 MPG | 17 MPG |
| City MPG | 15 MPG | 15 MPG |
| Highway MPG | 21 MPG | 21 MPG |
| Fuel tank | 21 gal (best) | 20 gal |
Performance
| Spec | Ford AerostarBase | Mercury VillagerValue |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 140 hp | 170 hp (best) |
| Torque | 160 lb-ft | 200 lb-ft (best) |
| Engine size | 3 L | 3.3 L (best) |
| Cylinders | V6 | V6 |
Size & capability
| Spec | Ford AerostarBase | Mercury VillagerValue |
|---|---|---|
| Seating | — | 7 seats (best) |
| Doors | 4 | 5 (best) |
| Towing capacity | — | 3,500 lbs (best) |
| Payload | 1,860 lbs (best) | — |
| Curb weight | — | 3,997 lbs (best) |
| Wheelbase | 118.9 in (best) | 112.2 in |
| Length | 174.9 in | 194.9 in (best) |
| Width | 71.7 in | 74.9 in (best) |
| Height | 72.3 in (best) | 70.1 in |
Safety & recalls
| Spec | Ford AerostarBase | Mercury VillagerValue |
|---|---|---|
| Frontal crash (driver) | 4 / 5 ★ | 5 / 5 ★ (best) |
| Frontal crash (passenger) | 3 / 5 ★ | 5 / 5 ★ (best) |
| Open recalls (YMM scope) | 3 | None reported (best) |
Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that spec when a clear winner exists. Specs reflect the selected trim for each vehicle. Drag a vehicle header to reorder columns. MSRP and specifications are manufacturer data; listing prices and inventory come from live dealer listings. Safety ratings are from NHTSA.
Trim overview
All available trims with MSRP. The trim selected above is highlighted; comparison specs use that selection.
| Trim | Ford Aerostar | Mercury Villager |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Base $0 MSRP(Currently comparing) | Value $19,340 MSRP(Currently comparing) |
| 2 | XLT $0 MSRP | Sport $24,340 MSRP |
| 3 | XLT $0 MSRP | Sport Plus $25,340 MSRP |
| 4 | XLT $0 MSRP | Estate $26,340 MSRP |
| 5 | — | Estate Premium $27,340 MSRP |
Ford Aerostar vs Mercury Villager FAQ
- Which is better: 1997 Ford Aerostar or 2002 Mercury Villager?
- It depends on priorities. OpenDealer compares 1997 Ford Aerostar vs 2002 Mercury Villager on MSRP, fuel economy, horsepower, seating, towing, NHTSA safety ratings, and live market prices so you can weigh the tradeoffs.
- Which costs less: 1997 Ford Aerostar or 2002 Mercury Villager?
- Based on starting MSRP, the 1997 Ford Aerostar starts lower at $0.
- Which has better startingMsrp: 1997 Ford Aerostar or 2002 Mercury Villager?
- The 1997 Ford Aerostar leads on startingMsrp in this comparison (0).
- Which has better horsepower: 1997 Ford Aerostar or 2002 Mercury Villager?
- The 2002 Mercury Villager leads on horsepower in this comparison (170).
- Which has better seats: 1997 Ford Aerostar or 2002 Mercury Villager?
- The 2002 Mercury Villager leads on seats in this comparison (7).
- Which has better maxTowingLbs: 1997 Ford Aerostar or 2002 Mercury Villager?
- The 2002 Mercury Villager leads on maxTowingLbs in this comparison (3,500).