Mazda B4000 vs Suzuki Equator
Side-by-side comparison from manufacturer specifications, NHTSA safety data, and live dealer listings.
Vehicles
Vehicles
2012 Suzuki Equator
Overview
| Spec | Mazda B4000B4000 | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Selected trim | B4000 | Base |
| Body style | Truck (Cab Plus) | Truck (Extended Cab) |
| Drivetrain | four wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
| Fuel type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| Transmission | 5-speed manual | 5-speed manual |
| Engine type | gas | gas |
| Model year | 2009 | 2012 |
Pricing & market
| Spec | Mazda B4000B4000 | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $22,150 | $17,899 (best) |
| For sale now | 0 | 0 |
Fuel economy & range
| Spec | Mazda B4000B4000 | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 16 MPG | 21 MPG (best) |
| City MPG | 15 MPG | 19 MPG (best) |
| Highway MPG | 19 MPG | 23 MPG (best) |
| Fuel tank | 19.5 gal | 21.1 gal (best) |
Performance
| Spec | Mazda B4000B4000 | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 207 hp (best) | 152 hp |
| Torque | 238 lb-ft (best) | 171 lb-ft |
| Engine size | 4 L (best) | 2.5 L |
| Cylinders | V6 | I4 |
Size & capability
| Spec | Mazda B4000B4000 | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Seating | 5 seats (best) | 4 seats |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Towing capacity | 5,600 lbs (best) | 3,500 lbs |
| Payload | 1,260 lbs (best) | 986 lbs |
| Curb weight | 3,662 lbs (best) | 3,686 lbs |
| Ground clearance | 7.9 in (best) | 7.6 in |
| Wheelbase | 125.9 in | 125.9 in |
| Length | 202.9 in | 206.6 in (best) |
| Width | 70.3 in | 72.8 in (best) |
| Height | 67.5 in | 68.7 in (best) |
Safety & recalls
| Spec | Mazda B4000B4000 | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Rollover | — | 4 / 5 ★ (best) |
| Open recalls (YMM scope) | None reported (best) | 2 |
Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that spec when a clear winner exists. Specs reflect the selected trim for each vehicle. Drag a vehicle header to reorder columns. MSRP and specifications are manufacturer data; listing prices and inventory come from live dealer listings. Safety ratings are from NHTSA.
Trim overview
All available trims with MSRP. The trim selected above is highlighted; comparison specs use that selection.
| Trim | Mazda B4000 | Suzuki Equator |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | B4000 $22,150 MSRP(Currently comparing) | Base $17,899 MSRP(Currently comparing) |
| 2 | — | Comfort Package $19,299 MSRP |
| 3 | — | Premium $22,799 MSRP |
| 4 | — | Sport $25,699 MSRP |
| 5 | — | Sport $26,299 MSRP |
| 6 | — | Sport $28,699 MSRP |
| 7 | — | RMZ-4 $29,550 MSRP |
Mazda B4000 vs Suzuki Equator FAQ
- Which is better: 2009 Mazda B4000 or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- It depends on priorities. OpenDealer compares 2009 Mazda B4000 vs 2012 Suzuki Equator on MSRP, fuel economy, horsepower, seating, towing, NHTSA safety ratings, and live market prices so you can weigh the tradeoffs.
- Which costs less: 2009 Mazda B4000 or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- Based on starting MSRP, the 2012 Suzuki Equator starts lower at $17,899.
- Which has better startingMsrp: 2009 Mazda B4000 or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- The 2012 Suzuki Equator leads on startingMsrp in this comparison (17,899).
- Which has better combinedMpg: 2009 Mazda B4000 or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- The 2012 Suzuki Equator leads on combinedMpg in this comparison (21).
- Which has better horsepower: 2009 Mazda B4000 or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- The 2012 Suzuki Equator leads on horsepower in this comparison (261).
- Which has better maxTowingLbs: 2009 Mazda B4000 or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- The 2012 Suzuki Equator leads on maxTowingLbs in this comparison (6,300).