Mercedes-Benz CLK320 vs Volvo C70
Side-by-side comparison from manufacturer specifications, NHTSA safety data, and live dealer listings.
Vehicles
Vehicles
2013 Volvo C70
Overview
| Spec | Mercedes-Benz CLK320CLK320 | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Selected trim | CLK320 | T5 |
| Body style | Coupe | Convertible |
| Drivetrain | rear wheel drive | front wheel drive |
| Fuel type | premium unleaded (required) | regular unleaded |
| Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Engine type | gas | gas |
| Model year | 2005 | 2013 |
Pricing & market
| Spec | Mercedes-Benz CLK320CLK320 | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $46,000 | $41,200 (best) |
| For sale now | 0 | 0 |
Fuel economy & range
| Spec | Mercedes-Benz CLK320CLK320 | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 21 MPG | 22 MPG (best) |
| City MPG | 18 MPG | 19 MPG (best) |
| Highway MPG | 26 MPG | 28 MPG (best) |
| Fuel tank | 16.4 gal (best) | 15.9 gal |
Performance
| Spec | Mercedes-Benz CLK320CLK320 | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 215 hp | 227 hp (best) |
| Torque | 229 lb-ft | 236 lb-ft (best) |
| Engine size | 3.2 L (best) | 2.5 L |
| Cylinders | V6 | I5 |
Size & capability
| Spec | Mercedes-Benz CLK320CLK320 | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Seating | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Cargo volume | 10.4 cu ft | 12.8 cu ft (best) |
| Towing capacity | — | 2,000 lbs (best) |
| Curb weight | 3,515 lbs (best) | 3,837 lbs |
| Ground clearance | — | 5.5 in (best) |
| Wheelbase | 106.9 in (best) | 103.9 in |
| Length | 182.6 in (best) | 180.4 in |
| Width | 68.5 in | 72.3 in (best) |
| Height | 55.4 in (best) | 55.1 in |
Safety & recalls
| Spec | Mercedes-Benz CLK320CLK320 | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA overall | — | Not Rated |
| Frontal crash (driver) | — | Not Rated |
| Frontal crash (passenger) | — | Not Rated |
| Side crash (driver) | — | Not Rated |
| Side crash (passenger) | — | Not Rated |
| Side pole | — | Not Rated |
| Rollover | — | Not Rated |
| Open recalls (YMM scope) | 3 | None reported (best) |
Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that spec when a clear winner exists. Specs reflect the selected trim for each vehicle. Drag a vehicle header to reorder columns. MSRP and specifications are manufacturer data; listing prices and inventory come from live dealer listings. Safety ratings are from NHTSA.
Trim overview
All available trims with MSRP. The trim selected above is highlighted; comparison specs use that selection.
| Trim | Mercedes-Benz CLK320 | Volvo C70 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | CLK320 $46,000 MSRP(Currently comparing) | T5 $41,200 MSRP(Currently comparing) |
| 2 | CLK320 $53,600 MSRP | — |
Mercedes-Benz CLK320 vs Volvo C70 FAQ
- Which is better: 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK320 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- It depends on priorities. OpenDealer compares 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK320 vs 2013 Volvo C70 on MSRP, fuel economy, horsepower, seating, towing, NHTSA safety ratings, and live market prices so you can weigh the tradeoffs.
- Which costs less: 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK320 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- Based on starting MSRP, the 2013 Volvo C70 starts lower at $41,200.
- Which has better startingMsrp: 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK320 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2013 Volvo C70 leads on startingMsrp in this comparison (41,200).
- Which has better combinedMpg: 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK320 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2013 Volvo C70 leads on combinedMpg in this comparison (22).
- Which has better horsepower: 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK320 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2013 Volvo C70 leads on horsepower in this comparison (227).
- Which has better maxTowingLbs: 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK320 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2013 Volvo C70 leads on maxTowingLbs in this comparison (2,000).
- How do the NHTSA safety ratings compare for 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK320 vs 2013 Volvo C70?
- NHTSA overall crash-test ratings in this comparison: Volvo C70 (Not Rated/5 NHTSA overall).