Mercedes-Benz SLK320 vs Volvo C70
Side-by-side comparison from manufacturer specifications, NHTSA safety data, and live dealer listings.
Vehicles
Vehicles
2013 Volvo C70
Overview
| Spec | Mercedes-Benz SLK320SLK320 | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Selected trim | SLK320 | T5 |
| Body style | Convertible | Convertible |
| Drivetrain | rear wheel drive | front wheel drive |
| Fuel type | premium unleaded (required) | regular unleaded |
| Transmission | 6-speed manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Engine type | gas | gas |
| Model year | 2004 | 2013 |
Pricing & market
| Spec | Mercedes-Benz SLK320SLK320 | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $45,050 | $41,200 (best) |
| For sale now | 0 | 0 |
Fuel economy & range
| Spec | Mercedes-Benz SLK320SLK320 | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 19 MPG | 22 MPG (best) |
| City MPG | 17 MPG | 19 MPG (best) |
| Highway MPG | 24 MPG | 28 MPG (best) |
| Fuel tank | 15.9 gal | 15.9 gal |
Performance
| Spec | Mercedes-Benz SLK320SLK320 | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 215 hp | 227 hp (best) |
| Torque | 229 lb-ft | 236 lb-ft (best) |
| Engine size | 3.2 L (best) | 2.5 L |
| Cylinders | V6 | I5 |
Size & capability
| Spec | Mercedes-Benz SLK320SLK320 | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Seating | 2 seats | 4 seats (best) |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Cargo volume | 9.5 cu ft | 12.8 cu ft (best) |
| Towing capacity | — | 2,000 lbs (best) |
| Curb weight | 3,120 lbs (best) | 3,837 lbs |
| Ground clearance | — | 5.5 in (best) |
| Wheelbase | 94.5 in | 103.9 in (best) |
| Length | 157.9 in | 180.4 in (best) |
| Width | 67.5 in | 72.3 in (best) |
| Height | 50.4 in | 55.1 in (best) |
Safety & recalls
| Spec | Mercedes-Benz SLK320SLK320 | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA overall | — | Not Rated |
| Frontal crash (driver) | — | Not Rated |
| Frontal crash (passenger) | — | Not Rated |
| Side crash (driver) | — | Not Rated |
| Side crash (passenger) | — | Not Rated |
| Side pole | — | Not Rated |
| Rollover | — | Not Rated |
| Open recalls (YMM scope) | None reported | None reported |
Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that spec when a clear winner exists. Specs reflect the selected trim for each vehicle. Drag a vehicle header to reorder columns. MSRP and specifications are manufacturer data; listing prices and inventory come from live dealer listings. Safety ratings are from NHTSA.
Trim overview
All available trims with MSRP. The trim selected above is highlighted; comparison specs use that selection.
| Trim | Mercedes-Benz SLK320 | Volvo C70 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | SLK320 $45,050 MSRP(Currently comparing) | T5 $41,200 MSRP(Currently comparing) |
Mercedes-Benz SLK320 vs Volvo C70 FAQ
- Which is better: 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK320 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- It depends on priorities. OpenDealer compares 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK320 vs 2013 Volvo C70 on MSRP, fuel economy, horsepower, seating, towing, NHTSA safety ratings, and live market prices so you can weigh the tradeoffs.
- Which costs less: 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK320 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- Based on starting MSRP, the 2013 Volvo C70 starts lower at $41,200.
- Which has better startingMsrp: 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK320 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2013 Volvo C70 leads on startingMsrp in this comparison (41,200).
- Which has better combinedMpg: 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK320 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2013 Volvo C70 leads on combinedMpg in this comparison (22).
- Which has better horsepower: 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK320 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2013 Volvo C70 leads on horsepower in this comparison (227).
- Which has better seats: 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK320 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2013 Volvo C70 leads on seats in this comparison (4).
- Which has better maxTowingLbs: 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK320 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2013 Volvo C70 leads on maxTowingLbs in this comparison (2,000).
- How do the NHTSA safety ratings compare for 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK320 vs 2013 Volvo C70?
- NHTSA overall crash-test ratings in this comparison: Volvo C70 (Not Rated/5 NHTSA overall).