Mercury Sable vs Subaru Forester
Side-by-side comparison from manufacturer specifications, NHTSA safety data, and live dealer listings.
Vehicles
Vehicles
2027 Subaru Forester
Overview
| Spec | Mercury SableBase | Subaru Forester4dr SUV AWD (2.5L 4cyl CVT) |
|---|---|---|
| Selected trim | Base | 4dr SUV AWD (2.5L 4cyl CVT) |
| Body style | Sedan | SUV |
| Drivetrain | front wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| Fuel type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| Transmission | 6-speed automatic | continuously variable-speed automatic |
| Engine type | gas | gas |
| Model year | 2009 | 2027 |
Pricing & market
| Spec | Mercury SableBase | Subaru Forester4dr SUV AWD (2.5L 4cyl CVT) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $25,120 (best) | $29,995 |
| For sale now | 0 | 0 |
Fuel economy & range
| Spec | Mercury SableBase | Subaru Forester4dr SUV AWD (2.5L 4cyl CVT) |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 21 MPG | 29 MPG (best) |
| City MPG | 18 MPG | 26 MPG (best) |
| Highway MPG | 28 MPG | 33 MPG (best) |
| Fuel tank | 20 gal (best) | 16.6 gal |
Performance
| Spec | Mercury SableBase | Subaru Forester4dr SUV AWD (2.5L 4cyl CVT) |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 263 hp (best) | 180 hp |
| Torque | 249 lb-ft (best) | 178 lb-ft |
| Engine size | 3.5 L (best) | 2.5 L |
| Cylinders | V6 | flat 4 |
Size & capability
| Spec | Mercury SableBase | Subaru Forester4dr SUV AWD (2.5L 4cyl CVT) |
|---|---|---|
| Seating | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Cargo volume | 21.2 cu ft | 74.4 cu ft (best) |
| Towing capacity | 1,000 lbs (best) | — |
| Curb weight | 3,670 lbs | 3,510 lbs (best) |
| Ground clearance | — | 8.7 in (best) |
| Wheelbase | 112.9 in (best) | 105.1 in |
| Length | 202.1 in (best) | 183.3 in |
| Width | 74.5 in (best) | 72 in |
| Height | 61.5 in | 68.1 in (best) |
Safety & recalls
| Spec | Mercury SableBase | Subaru Forester4dr SUV AWD (2.5L 4cyl CVT) |
|---|---|---|
| Frontal crash (driver) | 5 / 5 ★ (best) | — |
| Frontal crash (passenger) | 5 / 5 ★ (best) | — |
| Rollover | 4 / 5 ★ (best) | — |
| Open recalls (YMM scope) | None reported | None reported |
Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that spec when a clear winner exists. Specs reflect the selected trim for each vehicle. Drag a vehicle header to reorder columns. MSRP and specifications are manufacturer data; listing prices and inventory come from live dealer listings. Safety ratings are from NHTSA.
Trim overview
All available trims with MSRP. The trim selected above is highlighted; comparison specs use that selection.
| Trim | Mercury Sable | Subaru Forester |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Base $25,120 MSRP(Currently comparing) | 4dr SUV AWD (2.5L 4cyl CVT) $29,995 MSRP(Currently comparing) |
| 2 | Base $26,970 MSRP | Premium $31,995 MSRP |
| 3 | Premier $29,380 MSRP | Premium $33,195 MSRP |
| 4 | Premier $31,230 MSRP | Premium Hybrid $34,730 MSRP |
| 5 | — | Limited $37,595 MSRP |
| 6 | — | Sport Hybrid $37,930 MSRP |
| 7 | — | Limited Hybrid $38,995 MSRP |
| 8 | — | Wilderness $39,495 MSRP |
| 9 | — | Wilderness Hybrid $40,495 MSRP |
| 10 | — | Touring Hybrid $41,545 MSRP |
Mercury Sable vs Subaru Forester FAQ
- Which is better: 2009 Mercury Sable or 2027 Subaru Forester?
- It depends on priorities. OpenDealer compares 2009 Mercury Sable vs 2027 Subaru Forester on MSRP, fuel economy, horsepower, seating, towing, NHTSA safety ratings, and live market prices so you can weigh the tradeoffs.
- Which costs less: 2009 Mercury Sable or 2027 Subaru Forester?
- Based on starting MSRP, the 2009 Mercury Sable starts lower at $25,120.
- Which has better startingMsrp: 2009 Mercury Sable or 2027 Subaru Forester?
- The 2009 Mercury Sable leads on startingMsrp in this comparison (25,120).
- Which has better combinedMpg: 2009 Mercury Sable or 2027 Subaru Forester?
- The 2027 Subaru Forester leads on combinedMpg in this comparison (35).
- Which has better horsepower: 2009 Mercury Sable or 2027 Subaru Forester?
- The 2009 Mercury Sable leads on horsepower in this comparison (263).
- Which has better maxTowingLbs: 2009 Mercury Sable or 2027 Subaru Forester?
- The 2027 Subaru Forester leads on maxTowingLbs in this comparison (3,000).