Mitsubishi Raider vs Suzuki Equator
Side-by-side comparison from manufacturer specifications, NHTSA safety data, and live dealer listings.
Vehicles
Vehicles
2012 Suzuki Equator
Overview
| Spec | Mitsubishi RaiderLS | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Selected trim | LS | Base |
| Body style | Truck (Extended Cab) | Truck (Extended Cab) |
| Drivetrain | rear wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
| Fuel type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| Transmission | 6-speed manual | 5-speed manual |
| Engine type | gas | gas |
| Model year | 2009 | 2012 |
Pricing & market
| Spec | Mitsubishi RaiderLS | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $21,135 | $17,899 (best) |
| For sale now | 0 | 0 |
Fuel economy & range
| Spec | Mitsubishi RaiderLS | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 18 MPG | 21 MPG (best) |
| City MPG | 16 MPG | 19 MPG (best) |
| Highway MPG | 20 MPG | 23 MPG (best) |
| Fuel tank | 22 gal (best) | 21.1 gal |
Performance
| Spec | Mitsubishi RaiderLS | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 210 hp (best) | 152 hp |
| Torque | 235 lb-ft (best) | 171 lb-ft |
| Engine size | 3.7 L (best) | 2.5 L |
| Cylinders | V6 | I4 |
Size & capability
| Spec | Mitsubishi RaiderLS | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Seating | 5 seats (best) | 4 seats |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Cargo volume | 30 cu ft (best) | — |
| Towing capacity | 2,950 lbs | 3,500 lbs (best) |
| Payload | 1,720 lbs (best) | 986 lbs |
| Curb weight | 4,293 lbs | 3,686 lbs (best) |
| Ground clearance | 7.9 in (best) | 7.6 in |
| Wheelbase | 131.3 in (best) | 125.9 in |
| Length | 218.5 in (best) | 206.6 in |
| Width | 71.7 in | 72.8 in (best) |
| Height | 68.6 in | 68.7 in (best) |
Safety & recalls
| Spec | Mitsubishi RaiderLS | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Frontal crash (driver) | 5 / 5 ★ (best) | — |
| Frontal crash (passenger) | 5 / 5 ★ (best) | — |
| Rollover | 4 / 5 ★ | 4 / 5 ★ |
| Open recalls (YMM scope) | 2 | 2 |
Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that spec when a clear winner exists. Specs reflect the selected trim for each vehicle. Drag a vehicle header to reorder columns. MSRP and specifications are manufacturer data; listing prices and inventory come from live dealer listings. Safety ratings are from NHTSA.
Trim overview
All available trims with MSRP. The trim selected above is highlighted; comparison specs use that selection.
| Trim | Mitsubishi Raider | Suzuki Equator |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | LS $21,135 MSRP(Currently comparing) | Base $17,899 MSRP(Currently comparing) |
| 2 | LS $24,235 MSRP | Comfort Package $19,299 MSRP |
| 3 | LS $26,295 MSRP | Premium $22,799 MSRP |
| 4 | LS $29,425 MSRP | Sport $25,699 MSRP |
| 5 | — | Sport $26,299 MSRP |
| 6 | — | Sport $28,699 MSRP |
| 7 | — | RMZ-4 $29,550 MSRP |
Mitsubishi Raider vs Suzuki Equator FAQ
- Which is better: 2009 Mitsubishi Raider or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- It depends on priorities. OpenDealer compares 2009 Mitsubishi Raider vs 2012 Suzuki Equator on MSRP, fuel economy, horsepower, seating, towing, NHTSA safety ratings, and live market prices so you can weigh the tradeoffs.
- Which costs less: 2009 Mitsubishi Raider or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- Based on starting MSRP, the 2012 Suzuki Equator starts lower at $17,899.
- Which has better startingMsrp: 2009 Mitsubishi Raider or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- The 2012 Suzuki Equator leads on startingMsrp in this comparison (17,899).
- Which has better combinedMpg: 2009 Mitsubishi Raider or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- The 2012 Suzuki Equator leads on combinedMpg in this comparison (21).
- Which has better horsepower: 2009 Mitsubishi Raider or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- The 2012 Suzuki Equator leads on horsepower in this comparison (261).
- Which has better seats: 2009 Mitsubishi Raider or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- The 2009 Mitsubishi Raider leads on seats in this comparison (6).
- Which has better maxTowingLbs: 2009 Mitsubishi Raider or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- The 2012 Suzuki Equator leads on maxTowingLbs in this comparison (6,300).