Nissan 350Z vs Volvo C70
Side-by-side comparison from manufacturer specifications, NHTSA safety data, and live dealer listings.
Vehicles
Vehicles
2013 Volvo C70
Overview
| Spec | Nissan 350ZEnthusiast | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Selected trim | Enthusiast | T5 |
| Body style | Convertible | Convertible |
| Drivetrain | rear wheel drive | front wheel drive |
| Fuel type | premium unleaded (recommended) | regular unleaded |
| Transmission | 6-speed manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Engine type | gas | gas |
| Model year | 2009 | 2013 |
Pricing & market
| Spec | Nissan 350ZEnthusiast | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $36,870 (best) | $41,200 |
| For sale now | 0 | 0 |
Fuel economy & range
| Spec | Nissan 350ZEnthusiast | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 20 MPG | 22 MPG (best) |
| City MPG | 17 MPG | 19 MPG (best) |
| Highway MPG | 24 MPG | 28 MPG (best) |
| Fuel tank | 20 gal (best) | 15.9 gal |
Performance
| Spec | Nissan 350ZEnthusiast | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 306 hp (best) | 227 hp |
| Torque | 268 lb-ft (best) | 236 lb-ft |
| Engine size | 3.5 L (best) | 2.5 L |
| Cylinders | V6 | I5 |
Size & capability
| Spec | Nissan 350ZEnthusiast | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Seating | 2 seats | 4 seats (best) |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Cargo volume | 4.1 cu ft | 12.8 cu ft (best) |
| Towing capacity | — | 2,000 lbs (best) |
| Curb weight | 3,575 lbs (best) | 3,837 lbs |
| Ground clearance | — | 5.5 in (best) |
| Wheelbase | 104.3 in (best) | 103.9 in |
| Length | 169.8 in | 180.4 in (best) |
| Width | 71.5 in | 72.3 in (best) |
| Height | 52.5 in | 55.1 in (best) |
Safety & recalls
| Spec | Nissan 350ZEnthusiast | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA overall | — | Not Rated |
| Frontal crash (driver) | 5 / 5 ★ (best) | Not Rated |
| Frontal crash (passenger) | 4 / 5 ★ (best) | Not Rated |
| Side crash (driver) | — | Not Rated |
| Side crash (passenger) | — | Not Rated |
| Side pole | — | Not Rated |
| Rollover | — | Not Rated |
| Open recalls (YMM scope) | None reported | None reported |
Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that spec when a clear winner exists. Specs reflect the selected trim for each vehicle. Drag a vehicle header to reorder columns. MSRP and specifications are manufacturer data; listing prices and inventory come from live dealer listings. Safety ratings are from NHTSA.
Trim overview
All available trims with MSRP. The trim selected above is highlighted; comparison specs use that selection.
| Trim | Nissan 350Z | Volvo C70 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Enthusiast $36,870 MSRP(Currently comparing) | T5 $41,200 MSRP(Currently comparing) |
| 2 | Enthusiast $37,870 MSRP | — |
| 3 | Touring $39,220 MSRP | — |
| 4 | Touring $40,220 MSRP | — |
| 5 | Grand Touring $41,570 MSRP | — |
| 6 | Grand Touring $42,570 MSRP | — |
Nissan 350Z vs Volvo C70 FAQ
- Which is better: 2009 Nissan 350Z or 2013 Volvo C70?
- It depends on priorities. OpenDealer compares 2009 Nissan 350Z vs 2013 Volvo C70 on MSRP, fuel economy, horsepower, seating, towing, NHTSA safety ratings, and live market prices so you can weigh the tradeoffs.
- Which costs less: 2009 Nissan 350Z or 2013 Volvo C70?
- Based on starting MSRP, the 2009 Nissan 350Z starts lower at $36,870.
- Which has better startingMsrp: 2009 Nissan 350Z or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2009 Nissan 350Z leads on startingMsrp in this comparison (36,870).
- Which has better combinedMpg: 2009 Nissan 350Z or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2013 Volvo C70 leads on combinedMpg in this comparison (22).
- Which has better horsepower: 2009 Nissan 350Z or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2009 Nissan 350Z leads on horsepower in this comparison (306).
- Which has better seats: 2009 Nissan 350Z or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2013 Volvo C70 leads on seats in this comparison (4).
- Which has better maxTowingLbs: 2009 Nissan 350Z or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2013 Volvo C70 leads on maxTowingLbs in this comparison (2,000).
- How do the NHTSA safety ratings compare for 2009 Nissan 350Z vs 2013 Volvo C70?
- NHTSA overall crash-test ratings in this comparison: Volvo C70 (Not Rated/5 NHTSA overall).