Ram Dakota vs Suzuki Equator
Side-by-side comparison from manufacturer specifications, NHTSA safety data, and live dealer listings.
Vehicles
Vehicles
2012 Suzuki Equator
Overview
| Spec | Ram DakotaST | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Selected trim | ST | Base |
| Body style | Truck (Extended Cab) | Truck (Extended Cab) |
| Drivetrain | rear wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
| Fuel type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| Transmission | 4-speed automatic | 5-speed manual |
| Engine type | gas | gas |
| Model year | 2011 | 2012 |
Pricing & market
| Spec | Ram DakotaST | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $23,210 | $17,899 (best) |
| For sale now | 0 | 0 |
Fuel economy & range
| Spec | Ram DakotaST | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 17 MPG | 21 MPG (best) |
| City MPG | 15 MPG | 19 MPG (best) |
| Highway MPG | 20 MPG | 23 MPG (best) |
| Fuel tank | 22 gal (best) | 21.1 gal |
Performance
| Spec | Ram DakotaST | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 210 hp (best) | 152 hp |
| Torque | 235 lb-ft (best) | 171 lb-ft |
| Engine size | 3.7 L (best) | 2.5 L |
| Cylinders | V6 | I4 |
Size & capability
| Spec | Ram DakotaST | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Seating | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Towing capacity | 7,250 lbs (best) | 3,500 lbs |
| Payload | 1,810 lbs (best) | 986 lbs |
| Curb weight | 4,200 lbs | 3,686 lbs (best) |
| Ground clearance | 7.9 in (best) | 7.6 in |
| Wheelbase | 131.3 in (best) | 125.9 in |
| Length | 218.5 in (best) | 206.6 in |
| Width | 71.7 in | 72.8 in (best) |
| Height | 68.6 in | 68.7 in (best) |
Safety & recalls
| Spec | Ram DakotaST | Suzuki EquatorBase |
|---|---|---|
| Rollover | — | 4 / 5 ★ (best) |
| Open recalls (YMM scope) | None reported (best) | 2 |
Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that spec when a clear winner exists. Specs reflect the selected trim for each vehicle. Drag a vehicle header to reorder columns. MSRP and specifications are manufacturer data; listing prices and inventory come from live dealer listings. Safety ratings are from NHTSA.
Trim overview
All available trims with MSRP. The trim selected above is highlighted; comparison specs use that selection.
| Trim | Ram Dakota | Suzuki Equator |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ST $23,210 MSRP(Currently comparing) | Base $17,899 MSRP(Currently comparing) |
| 2 | ST $27,460 MSRP | Comfort Package $19,299 MSRP |
| 3 | BigHorn $24,085 MSRP | Premium $22,799 MSRP |
| 4 | BigHorn $26,780 MSRP | Sport $25,699 MSRP |
| 5 | BigHorn $28,335 MSRP | Sport $26,299 MSRP |
| 6 | BigHorn $29,730 MSRP | Sport $28,699 MSRP |
| 7 | LoneStar $24,085 MSRP | RMZ-4 $29,550 MSRP |
| 8 | LoneStar $26,780 MSRP | — |
| 9 | LoneStar $28,335 MSRP | — |
| 10 | LoneStar $29,730 MSRP | — |
| 11 | ST Fleet $25,760 MSRP | — |
| 12 | ST Fleet $28,710 MSRP | — |
| 13 | Laramie $30,635 MSRP | — |
| 14 | Laramie $33,635 MSRP | — |
| 15 | TRX Fleet $31,820 MSRP | — |
Ram Dakota vs Suzuki Equator FAQ
- Which is better: 2011 Ram Dakota or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- It depends on priorities. OpenDealer compares 2011 Ram Dakota vs 2012 Suzuki Equator on MSRP, fuel economy, horsepower, seating, towing, NHTSA safety ratings, and live market prices so you can weigh the tradeoffs.
- Which costs less: 2011 Ram Dakota or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- Based on starting MSRP, the 2012 Suzuki Equator starts lower at $17,899.
- Which has better startingMsrp: 2011 Ram Dakota or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- The 2012 Suzuki Equator leads on startingMsrp in this comparison (17,899).
- Which has better combinedMpg: 2011 Ram Dakota or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- The 2012 Suzuki Equator leads on combinedMpg in this comparison (21).
- Which has better horsepower: 2011 Ram Dakota or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- The 2011 Ram Dakota leads on horsepower in this comparison (302).
- Which has better maxTowingLbs: 2011 Ram Dakota or 2012 Suzuki Equator?
- The 2011 Ram Dakota leads on maxTowingLbs in this comparison (7,250).