Saab 9-3 vs Volvo C70
Side-by-side comparison from manufacturer specifications, NHTSA safety data, and live dealer listings.
Vehicles
Vehicles
2013 Volvo C70
Overview
| Spec | Saab 9-32.0T | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Selected trim | 2.0T | T5 |
| Body style | Sedan | Convertible |
| Drivetrain | front wheel drive | front wheel drive |
| Fuel type | premium unleaded (recommended) | regular unleaded |
| Transmission | 6-speed manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Engine type | gas | gas |
| Model year | 2011 | 2013 |
Pricing & market
| Spec | Saab 9-32.0T | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $28,900 (best) | $41,200 |
| For sale now | 0 | 0 |
Fuel economy & range
| Spec | Saab 9-32.0T | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 24 MPG (best) | 22 MPG |
| City MPG | 21 MPG (best) | 19 MPG |
| Highway MPG | 31 MPG (best) | 28 MPG |
| Fuel tank | 16.4 gal (best) | 15.9 gal |
Performance
| Spec | Saab 9-32.0T | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 210 hp | 227 hp (best) |
| Torque | 221 lb-ft | 236 lb-ft (best) |
| Engine size | 2 L | 2.5 L (best) |
| Cylinders | I4 | I5 |
Size & capability
| Spec | Saab 9-32.0T | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Seating | 5 seats (best) | 4 seats |
| Doors | 4 (best) | 2 |
| Cargo volume | 15 cu ft (best) | 12.8 cu ft |
| Towing capacity | — | 2,000 lbs (best) |
| Curb weight | — | 3,837 lbs (best) |
| Ground clearance | 5.9 in (best) | 5.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 105.3 in (best) | 103.9 in |
| Length | 182.9 in (best) | 180.4 in |
| Width | 70.9 in | 72.3 in (best) |
| Height | 57.1 in (best) | 55.1 in |
Safety & recalls
| Spec | Saab 9-32.0T | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA overall | — | Not Rated |
| Frontal crash (driver) | — | Not Rated |
| Frontal crash (passenger) | — | Not Rated |
| Side crash (driver) | — | Not Rated |
| Side crash (passenger) | — | Not Rated |
| Side pole | — | Not Rated |
| Rollover | 4 / 5 ★ (best) | Not Rated |
| Open recalls (YMM scope) | 3 | None reported (best) |
Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that spec when a clear winner exists. Specs reflect the selected trim for each vehicle. Drag a vehicle header to reorder columns. MSRP and specifications are manufacturer data; listing prices and inventory come from live dealer listings. Safety ratings are from NHTSA.
Trim overview
All available trims with MSRP. The trim selected above is highlighted; comparison specs use that selection.
| Trim | Saab 9-3 | Volvo C70 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0T $28,900 MSRP(Currently comparing) | T5 $41,200 MSRP(Currently comparing) |
| 2 | 2.0T $30,330 MSRP | — |
| 3 | 2.0T $39,990 MSRP | — |
| 4 | 2.0T $32,395 MSRP | — |
| 5 | Aero $35,340 MSRP | — |
| 6 | Aero $37,020 MSRP | — |
| 7 | Aero $45,080 MSRP | — |
| 8 | Aero $38,115 MSRP | — |
Saab 9-3 vs Volvo C70 FAQ
- Which is better: 2011 Saab 9-3 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- It depends on priorities. OpenDealer compares 2011 Saab 9-3 vs 2013 Volvo C70 on MSRP, fuel economy, horsepower, seating, towing, NHTSA safety ratings, and live market prices so you can weigh the tradeoffs.
- Which costs less: 2011 Saab 9-3 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- Based on starting MSRP, the 2011 Saab 9-3 starts lower at $28,900.
- Which has better startingMsrp: 2011 Saab 9-3 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2011 Saab 9-3 leads on startingMsrp in this comparison (28,900).
- Which has better combinedMpg: 2011 Saab 9-3 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2011 Saab 9-3 leads on combinedMpg in this comparison (24).
- Which has better horsepower: 2011 Saab 9-3 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2013 Volvo C70 leads on horsepower in this comparison (227).
- Which has better seats: 2011 Saab 9-3 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2011 Saab 9-3 leads on seats in this comparison (5).
- Which has better maxTowingLbs: 2011 Saab 9-3 or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2013 Volvo C70 leads on maxTowingLbs in this comparison (2,000).
- How do the NHTSA safety ratings compare for 2011 Saab 9-3 vs 2013 Volvo C70?
- NHTSA overall crash-test ratings in this comparison: Volvo C70 (Not Rated/5 NHTSA overall).