Volkswagen Eos vs Volvo C70
Side-by-side comparison from manufacturer specifications, NHTSA safety data, and live dealer listings.
Vehicles
Vehicles
2013 Volvo C70
Overview
| Spec | Volkswagen EosKomfort | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Selected trim | Komfort | T5 |
| Body style | Convertible | Convertible |
| Drivetrain | front wheel drive | front wheel drive |
| Fuel type | premium unleaded (recommended) | regular unleaded |
| Transmission | 6-speed automated manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Engine type | gas | gas |
| Model year | 2016 | 2013 |
Pricing & market
| Spec | Volkswagen EosKomfort | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $31,995 (best) | $41,200 |
| For sale now | 0 | 0 |
Fuel economy & range
| Spec | Volkswagen EosKomfort | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 25 MPG (best) | 22 MPG |
| City MPG | 22 MPG (best) | 19 MPG |
| Highway MPG | 30 MPG (best) | 28 MPG |
| Fuel tank | 14.5 gal | 15.9 gal (best) |
Performance
| Spec | Volkswagen EosKomfort | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 200 hp | 227 hp (best) |
| Torque | 207 lb-ft | 236 lb-ft (best) |
| Engine size | 2 L | 2.5 L (best) |
| Cylinders | I4 | I5 |
Size & capability
| Spec | Volkswagen EosKomfort | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Seating | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Cargo volume | 10.5 cu ft | 12.8 cu ft (best) |
| Towing capacity | — | 2,000 lbs (best) |
| Payload | 932 lbs (best) | — |
| Curb weight | 3,508 lbs (best) | 3,837 lbs |
| Ground clearance | 5.6 in (best) | 5.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 101.5 in | 103.9 in (best) |
| Length | 174.1 in | 180.4 in (best) |
| Width | 70.5 in | 72.3 in (best) |
| Height | 56.9 in (best) | 55.1 in |
Safety & recalls
| Spec | Volkswagen EosKomfort | Volvo C70T5 |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA overall | — | Not Rated |
| Frontal crash (driver) | — | Not Rated |
| Frontal crash (passenger) | — | Not Rated |
| Side crash (driver) | — | Not Rated |
| Side crash (passenger) | — | Not Rated |
| Side pole | — | Not Rated |
| Rollover | — | Not Rated |
| Open recalls (YMM scope) | 2 | None reported (best) |
Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that spec when a clear winner exists. Specs reflect the selected trim for each vehicle. Drag a vehicle header to reorder columns. MSRP and specifications are manufacturer data; listing prices and inventory come from live dealer listings. Safety ratings are from NHTSA.
Trim overview
All available trims with MSRP. The trim selected above is highlighted; comparison specs use that selection.
| Trim | Volkswagen Eos | Volvo C70 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Komfort $31,995 MSRP(Currently comparing) | T5 $41,200 MSRP(Currently comparing) |
Volkswagen Eos vs Volvo C70 FAQ
- Which is better: 2016 Volkswagen Eos or 2013 Volvo C70?
- It depends on priorities. OpenDealer compares 2016 Volkswagen Eos vs 2013 Volvo C70 on MSRP, fuel economy, horsepower, seating, towing, NHTSA safety ratings, and live market prices so you can weigh the tradeoffs.
- Which costs less: 2016 Volkswagen Eos or 2013 Volvo C70?
- Based on starting MSRP, the 2016 Volkswagen Eos starts lower at $31,995.
- Which has better startingMsrp: 2016 Volkswagen Eos or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2016 Volkswagen Eos leads on startingMsrp in this comparison (31,995).
- Which has better combinedMpg: 2016 Volkswagen Eos or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2016 Volkswagen Eos leads on combinedMpg in this comparison (25).
- Which has better horsepower: 2016 Volkswagen Eos or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2013 Volvo C70 leads on horsepower in this comparison (227).
- Which has better maxTowingLbs: 2016 Volkswagen Eos or 2013 Volvo C70?
- The 2013 Volvo C70 leads on maxTowingLbs in this comparison (2,000).
- How do the NHTSA safety ratings compare for 2016 Volkswagen Eos vs 2013 Volvo C70?
- NHTSA overall crash-test ratings in this comparison: Volvo C70 (Not Rated/5 NHTSA overall).